Thursday, February 13, 2014

Relative Advantage

Instructional software is nothing new. However, the ways that teachers and students are utilizing many of its tools are. Roblyer & Doering claim that "it used to be easy to classify a software package by the type of teaching function it served--drill-and-practice, tutorial, simulation, instructional game, or problem-solving program. But many of today's software packages or systems fulfill several different functions (p. 78)." As teachers, we need to adopt an active role in responsibly analyzing available instructional software packages to "ensure it supports [our] specific teaching needs (p. 79)." In other words, we need to determine whether or not a given instructional software legitimately creates a relative advantage for teaching and learning.

Instructional software generally offers multiple advantages to the teaching and learning process. To list them all would be quite a task. However, some that are included are 1) providing work examples for students and receiving immediate feedback on correctness, 2) enabling students to learn a topic in a self-contained instructional unit, 3) gaining an understanding of how a real life system works through a computerized model of that system, 4) adding elements of gameplay to learning activities, and 5) providing opportunities for students to foster component approaches to problem-solving. To learn more about what instructional software can offer, along with a list of related resources, view my VoiceThread presentation here.

After gaining an awareness of the potential uses of instructional software in education, we must effectively turn inward to identify any existing needs in instruction that are currently going unmet. Only after we do this should we begin looking for appropriate instructional software packages to remediate such deficits in the classroom. However, once a need is identified that instructional software has the potential to meet, how are we supposed to go about locating and evaluating the effectiveness of a given instructional software design? To answer this, I've embedded a SlideShare presentation addressing that issue below. You can also find it to share at it's original URL.


Instructional software evaluation from fawzif2000

As with identifying the presence of an instructional need, determining the effectiveness of instructional software has multiple components. Important to consider in this evaluation process is the existence and quality of the following seven characteristics:

  1. Content
  2. Design
  3. Use among different ability levels
  4. Assessment
  5. Ease of use
  6. Technical quality
  7. Documentation and support
It is a comprehensive approach to the integration of instructional software in the presence of a legitimate need that results in improved teaching and learning. When relative advantage is identified and the necessary prerequisite steps are taken in the technology integration process, effective instructional design can create "learning environments that provide learners opportunities to apply their knowledge to solve practical problems and invite exploration [that] can lead to faster learning, greater retention, and higher levels of motivation and interest (Van Dam, Becker, and Simpson, 2005)."



Resources:

Fawziff2000. Instructional software evaluation criteria [Slideshare]. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/fawzif2000/instructional-software-evaluation

Roblyer, M.D., & Doering, A.H. (2013). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Boston:
Pearson/Allyn and Bacon Publishers.

Van Dam, A., Becker, S., & Simpson R.M. (2005) Next-generation educational software: why we need it and a research agenda for getting it. Educause Review Online,  40 (2), 26-43. http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/next-generation-educational-software-why-we-need-it-and-research-agenda-getting-it 

4 comments:

  1. Dave,
    Your resources for analyzing software for both teachers and students are an incredible resource for them. There are so many programs out there that it is sometimes confusing for educators to know what to use.
    One piece of information really popped out for me. You mention that software should have a way for teachers to see how students are progressing. I think that is vital! In my own teaching experiences, I have found that to be vital! If there is no way to see how students are progressing, it becomes a shot in the dark rather than a chance to hit a target.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You may want check the link to your VoiceThread; it sent me to the Weebly homepage.

    I would agree with you that the seven criteria from the SlideShare you found hit all the key criteria for evaluating software. When I think the cases where I've seen poor choices about instructional software, I can easily identify some of those criteria the parties involved did not consider. The one criteria I would add is compatibility with existing systems. My district has Blackboard LMS, but teachers make limited use of the assessment tools included because there is not an easy way to sync grades from Blackboard to our student records system. As usual, I enjoyed seeing your insights on the topic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Throughout the research process for this assignment, I found an immense amount of instructional software available as freeware and available at a cost. The key as educators is to find the software that works best for your particular situation. The slideshare and discussion about evaluating the effectiveness of software are valuable tools for educators to use. Finding effective software is essential to making sure that we are not "using technology for technology's sake."

    ReplyDelete
  4. One of the aspects pf your blog that stood out for me was the "ease of use" criteria in determining quality instructional software. I have come across some excellent programs in all areas of instructional software, but upon testing the product I found it difficult to use, and I know that if I struggle my students will find the task too daunting to make it worth their effort. I think ease of use also makes quality assessment more valuable. If a student does poorly there is no way to know if the student didn't understand the content or the program. Great job on determining the important aspects of your evaluation system.

    ReplyDelete